| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the boa formIpQos mac functionality of X2000R (version(s): TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability. |
| ConnMan through 2.0 has a stack-based buffer overflow via a DHCPv6 Reply message. This occurs in get_domains in gdhcp/client.c. It copies a fixed NS_MAXDNAME (1025) bytes from a DHCPv6 DOMAIN_LIST (option 24) value into a 1026-byte stack buffer dns_name regardless of the actual option length, then walks DNS labels with an unbounded "c += jump + 1" loop. A crafted DHCPv6 REPLY with a DOMAIN_LIST option of >= 1025 non-zero bytes makes the label walk leave the buffer and read/write '.' past its end in attacker-chosen strides. An on-link attacker can trigger this without authentication via a forged Router Advertisement (O=1) and a forged DHCPv6 REPLY matching xid/CLIENTID with a long DOMAIN_LIST. The impact is unauthenticated on-link crash of connmand (runs as root). This was introduced in bb06c47. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Host Guardian Service allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Internet Information Services allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| IBM MQ could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack buffer overflow when processing TLS certificates with malformed distinguished names during channel connection establishment. |
| Numeric truncation error in Windows Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| A stack overflow in the gf_bifs_dec_node function (/bifs/field_decode.c) of GPAC Project/MP4Box before 2.5 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via supplying a crafted MP4 file. |
| GIMP APNG File Parsing Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of GIMP. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file.
The specific flaw exists within the parsing of APNG files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-29400. |
| IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 and 2.1 are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow, caused by improper bounds checking. An attacker could overflow the buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system. |
| In EmberZNet 9.1.1 and earlier, a malformed GetGroupMembership message can result in an out-of-bounds write leading to a crash. A limited number of values can be written using this vulnerability, so no route to remote code execution was observed. These messages must come from a device that has already joined the network. Only devices supporting the Group Cluster are impacted. |
| In EmberZNet 9.1.1 and earlier, a malformed Publish Price Matrix command can result in an out-of-bounds write potentially leading to remote code execution. These messages must come from a device that has already joined the network. Only devices supporting the Price Cluster are impacted. |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the password functionality could allow an unauthenticated attacker to achieve code execution when the SafeEnhancement feature is enabled. |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the log message functionality could allow an unauthenticated attacker to achieve code execution. |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the Cookie parsing methods could allow an unauthenticated attacker to achieve code execution when the SafeEnhancement feature is enabled. |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the upload functionality could allow an authenticated attacker to achieve code execution. |
